How a Mother Got Her Son’s Sponsorship Approved After a PFL
- Program
- Family sponsorship of a dependent son
- Client
- A mother living in Canada as a permanent resident
- Challenge
- An earlier declaration, then a PFL, DNA testing and an ADR
- Result & Timeline
- Son’s permanent residence approved
Written by the Brightlight Immigration team. Reviewed by Loveneet Paneswar, RCIC (licence R522969).
A mother in Canada had been told, during her refugee claim, that she could never sponsor her son. Brightlight Immigration handled a PFL, a DNA test request and an ADR, and IRCC approved his permanent residence.
The situation
A client came to Brightlight Immigration in Surrey, BC, feeling nervous. She was a permanent resident living in Canada. During her earlier refugee claim, one of her minor children had been left behind.
She wanted to sponsor her son so he could become a permanent resident and the family could be reunited. IRCC (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, the federal department that decides immigration applications) would decide the application. But she had been told she would never be able to sponsor him, and IRCC had asked her to sign a declaration acknowledging this.
The challenge: a PFL, DNA testing and an ADR
Many people in this position believe an earlier declaration closes the door for good. This client believed it too. Her son was below the age of 22 at the time, and then the challenges began.
First, IRCC sent a PFL (Procedural Fairness Letter, a letter that shares IRCC’s concerns and gives the applicant a chance to respond before a decision). Next, IRCC asked for DNA testing. Then IRCC sent an ADR (Additional Document Request, a request for more documents).
Each step added pressure to the file. If the application failed, a mother and her son would stay apart.
How we prepared the file
Loveneet Paneswar, RCIC (Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant) and founder of Brightlight Immigration, reviewed the file and guided our approach. We took this case on personally. It was not just another immigration file. We wanted to reunite this mother with her child.
We also prepared the client for what was coming. We expected IRCC to ask for DNA testing, and we told her before it happened.
The heart of our argument was the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada’s law on basic rights, and the legal principle of the best interests of the child. This principle says that decisions affecting a child should consider what is best for that child. We built our response on both, backed by our years of experience.
The outcome: son’s permanent residence approved
IRCC approved the permanent residence of the client’s son, the child she had once been told she could never sponsor.
Sumir Paneswar, co-founder and chief client manager, called her to share the news himself. He told her that IRCC was saying to get the passport ready, because her son’s PR (permanent residence) was approved. She gasped, screamed and cried tears of joy.
“Thank you! Thank you! Are you serious?!”
Brightlight client, mother of the approved applicant
Sumir told her he wanted to give her the news personally, because he had promised that we would do our best. Crying and laughing, she said, “I am happy!” Sumir answered that he was happy for her.
For a mother who had once been told she could never sponsor her son, the call brought news she had thought was out of reach. Her next step is to get the passport ready. What made this case work was early preparation for each IRCC step and a clear legal argument based on the Charter and the best interests of the child.
Facing a similar situation?
If you are in a similar situation, feel stuck after a PFL or a declaration, or do not know which application to choose or how to apply, you do not have to work it out alone. Brightlight Immigration can help you bring someone to Canada. We bring 14+ years of Canadian immigration experience, including work on refused cases and Procedural Fairness Letters, and we serve you in English, Punjabi, Hindi and Urdu. When you are ready, you can book a free assessment with us, with no pressure.
Client details have been kept private. Every immigration case is different, and results depend on individual facts and IRCC decisions.
Client details have been kept private. Every immigration case is different, and results depend on individual facts and IRCC decisions.